Re: Odd issue with fail2ban

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 13:30 -0400, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Sorry, can't do that with servers whose websites are open to the world,
> and when folks here have collaborators around the world.

Well if those people have to log in using SSH from all across the world
white listing would not be feasible. But I wouldn't expect you to let
those collaborators log in to your log host from anywhere? So white
listing and blocking anyone else (on single or repeated connect or
disconnect) should be an option there. Although in this scenario you
could just as well block port 22 for every but the white listed hosts
using iptables, unless you need the ban messages for statistical
purposes.

Also, in the default configuration for the ssh-iptables jail the bans
resulting from failed SSH logins will only block access to port 22. So
even if someone would trigger a ban by attempting too many logins within
the set findtime they would still be able to access other services.

Regards,
Leonard.

-- 
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux