On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 18:54 +0100, J.J.Garcia wrote: > Hi Ignacio, > > I'm running Centos 4.2 on some machines and just wonder which is the > correct procedure to build one of your packages i've fonund in the > fedora.ivazquez.net for FC4 but for CentOs for kernel-modules: > > http://fedora.ivazquez.net/yum/4/i386/SRPMS.ivazquez/kernel-module-qc-usb-0.6.3-0.iva.1.src.rpm > http://fedora.ivazquez.net/yum/3/i386/SRPMS.ivazquez/kernel-module-qc-usb-0.6.3-0.iva.2.src.rpm > > I've tried unsuccesfully (following dag's Faq for rebuilding against the > current kernel): > > # rpmbuild --rebuild --define 'kernel $(uname -r)' --target $(uname -m)\ > kernel-module-qc-usb-0.6.3-0.iva.1.src.rpm 1) My standards and Dag's standards are different. See the beginning of the spec file for details. Quick summary: If you're building for the running kernel then you don't need to provide any defines, just a target. 2) You might want to try the SRPM I've built for CentOS instead. http://centos.ivazquez.net/yum/4/i386/SRPMS.ivazquez/kernel-module-qc-usb-0.6.3-0.iva.0.src.rpm -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://centos.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051106/03061773/attachment.bin