Re: A couple of 32-bit packages got no update in 6.3/x86_64

[Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Michael Lampe
<lampe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Namely:
>
> * hivex
> * hivex-devel
> * librdmac
> * librdmac-devel
> * sanlock-libs
> * sanlock-devel
>
> and maybe others.
>
> Is this on purpose (I don't know if upstream has removed or updated the
> 32-bit rpms, but the old ones are still in C6.3/x86_64), or is it just
> the usual sloppyness (I've been told here on previous occasions the
> biarch is a pain in the ass to maintain, nobody cares anyway, it's not
> 'plain', and no sensible man should be using it).

FYI:

http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5836

Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos