Re: XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 07/08/2012 08:47 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> There are other Xen-based virtualization solutions out there aswell with full support.

That's true, but I'm guessing that a lot of people on this list are here 
specifically because they're not paying for support.

Whether that's true or not, if you're deploying virtualization *on 
CentOS*, KVM is really the only rational choice.  Xen hosting support is 
no longer a part of new releases.


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux