Appreciate all the discussion, folks. Got some boxes that have some separate / and /usr, since we're a /usr/local religion shop. (GRIN...) Someone long long ago, in a galaxy far, far away picked /usr as the split point, instead of /usr/local itself. So... Layers 8 and 9 of the OSI model, bite again... Religion and Politics. Guess we'll be moving to /opt or /usr/local being the separate mountpoint. I'm sure this will be a happy internal discussion... hahaha... Nate _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
- From: Nate Duehr <denverpilot@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:30:03 -0600
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1341316634.22992.9.camel@centos501.homegroannetwork>
- References:
- Question about storage for virtualisation
- From: Nicolas Ross
- Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
- From: Gordon Messmer
- Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
- From: Nate Duehr
- Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
- From: Gordon Messmer
- Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
- From: Tilman Schmidt
- Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
- From: William L. Maltby
- Question about storage for virtualisation
- Prev by Date: Re: after last update google-chrome no runs anymore
- Next by Date: Re: after last update google-chrome no runs anymore
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
- Next by thread: C-icap and squidclamav
- Index(es):
 |