Re: leap second

[Warren Young <warren@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 7/2/2012 10:24 AM, Peter Eckel wrote:
>
> ... and leap seconds are not even scarce.

An event on an unpredictable schedule averaging 1.7 years since 1972 
doesn't count as "scarce"?

That's the answer to Les's outrage, too, by the way.  Might as well 
expect the JRE to have code to deal with cosmic ray damage that gets by 
ECC, too.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos