On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:09:41AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > I'm sort of curious about how a bug of this magnitude slips through > the QA process (into java and RHEL, not CentOS). With all the furor > about y2k, did no one even bother to simulate a leap second ahead of > the real occurrence? The kernel bug is a race condition; simulations may not have detected it. -- rgds Stephen _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: leap second
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: leap second
- From: Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:24:11 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAOAgVpxmquE_pZovYA2OuLi02wbSESL=D2poHoBEsCoJjJo6VA@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: leap second
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: leap second
- References:
- leap second
- From: Bob Hoffman
- Re: leap second
- From: Mogens Kjaer
- Re: leap second
- From: Erez Zarum
- Re: leap second
- From: me
- Re: leap second
- From: Keith Roberts
- Re: leap second
- From: Les Mikesell
- leap second
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about storage for virtualisation
- Next by Date: Re: leap second
- Previous by thread: Re: leap second
- Next by thread: Re: leap second
- Index(es):
 |