On 06/14/12 12:46 AM, Arun Khan wrote: > [1] The Client's ERP vendor has validated the application on the 32 > bit platform only thus the reason for 32 bit version. the client should find a ERP vendor who's not stuck back in the 90s. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: CentOS 6.2 32 default kernel support pae?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: CentOS 6.2 32 default kernel support pae?
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:16:00 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAHhM8gAdZ-R=-dXNmogpJWRt=wY3HGuWY1h+V6_OxBt-14HNEw@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CentOS 6.2 32 default kernel support pae?
- From: Arun Khan
- Re: CentOS 6.2 32 default kernel support pae?
- References:
- CentOS 6.2 32 default kernel support pae?
- From: Arun Khan
- CentOS 6.2 32 default kernel support pae?
- Prev by Date: Re: CentOS 6.2 32 default kernel support pae?
- Next by Date: Two CentOS installations failed dual boot
- Previous by thread: Re: CentOS 6.2 32 default kernel support pae?
- Next by thread: Re: CentOS 6.2 32 default kernel support pae?
- Index(es):
 |