Dale Dellutri <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Visibility aside, isn't rc.local much too late for setting > up iptables? As at least 1 other has mentioned as well. > My /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/ has an S08iptables and an S10network, > then lots more, including an S99local, and then after all > this, rc.local is run. FYI ... (Fedora Core 3) ... $ ls -la /etc/rc5.d/S99local ... /etc/rc5.d/S99local -> ../rc.local > By this time, the network has already been up. It seems to > me that if you want to do some iptables setup, it must be > done before S10network, or it leaves a short-time security > hole. Again, as at least 1 other has mentioned as well. > Personally, I set up the iptables I want and then do > service iptables save > If I was worried about changes, I guess I'd modify > S08iptables to check that nothing has changed, or add an > S07checkiptables script. Such can be done with a conditional like ... [ "`rcsdiff /etc/sysconfig/iptables`" != "" ] Which will return true if the file hasn't changed from the last RCS check-in (which should be the last edit ;-). > (This is my first post to this mailing list, so I hope I've > done it correctly.) Wrong! @-ppp -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)