On 14/05/2012 19:15, Steve Clark wrote: > Yes the fc12 version loads just fine. > ipsec-tools-0.7.3-4.fc12.i686 > So it's not in CentOS 6. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Openswan or Ipsec-tools?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Openswan or Ipsec-tools?
- From: Shaun <centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:31:51 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4FB14BD8.6060202@netwolves.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
- References:
- Openswan or Ipsec-tools?
- From: Sergio Belkin
- Re: Openswan or Ipsec-tools?
- From: nemus
- Re: Openswan or Ipsec-tools?
- From: Shaun
- Re: Openswan or Ipsec-tools?
- From: Sergio Belkin
- Re: Openswan or Ipsec-tools?
- From: Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez
- Re: Openswan or Ipsec-tools?
- From: Steve Clark
- Re: Openswan or Ipsec-tools?
- From: Sergio Belkin
- Re: Openswan or Ipsec-tools?
- From: Steve Clark
- Openswan or Ipsec-tools?
- Prev by Date: Re: Excluding ConsoleKit in kickstart
- Next by Date: using fscache
- Previous by thread: Re: Openswan or Ipsec-tools?
- Next by thread: CentOS 6, Raid 1, and LVM
- Index(es):
 |