Re: File size diff on local disk vs NFS share

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On May 3, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Glenn Cooper wrote:

>>>> I never really paid attention to this but a file on an NFS mount is
>>>> showing 64M in size, but when copying the file to a local drive, it
>>>> shows 2.5MB in size.
>>>> 
>>>> My NFS server is hardware Raided with a volume stripe size of 128K
>>>> were the volume size is 20TB, my local disk is about 500GB.
>>>> 
>>>> Is this due to my stripe size?
>>>> 
>>>> Nuggets are appreciated.
> 
>> By the way, this is only across NFS as when ssh'd into the server, the file size shows 2.5M, same as the clients when its local so its seems NFS is the culprit.
>> 
>> I have r/wsize tweaked but thats it.
> 
> Wild guess - cached file attributes not getting updated properly in the NFS client?  Has the actual file size changed recently, like in the last few hours or days?
> 
> Cheers,
> Glenn


Hi,

More info.

So the file in question is showing to be 2.5MB today, were as yesterday it was ~66MB.

A new file generated today is also 2.4MB but via NFS its 66MB, even when logged in to the server locally its 66MB!

You hinted to cache and so I looked around my Raid controller settings, specifically write through vs write back.

I will change it from write back to write through later tonight and report back.

The pattern is all files new files look to be 66MB until some time later.

I do have a 4GB mem cache on this Raid controller (Areca).

- aurf

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux