Hi all, I never really paid attention to this but a file on an NFS mount is showing 64M in size, but when copying the file to a local drive, it shows 2.5MB in size. My NFS server is hardware Raided with a volume stripe size of 128K were the volume size is 20TB. My NFS clients are the same distro as the server being Centos. Is this due to my stripe size? Nuggets are appreciated. - aurf _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
File size diff between NFS mount and local disk
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: File size diff between NFS mount and local disk
- From: aurfalien <aurfalien@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 12:56:05 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Fwd: File size diff between NFS mount and local disk
- From: aurfalien
- Fwd: File size diff between NFS mount and local disk
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with writing a udev rule
- Next by Date: Re: editing bind (DNS) configuration under CentOS 6
- Previous by thread: Help with writing a udev rule
- Next by thread: Fwd: File size diff between NFS mount and local disk
- Index(es):
 |