Re: Maintainer for Krita on CentOS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 19:53,  <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I hate having to worry about multiple libraries. And in updates of the
>> std. packages, it can break your specialized one. I would have to
>> recommend to your krista list to build against the library we have now.
>>
>> A question: what new functionality does the newer library provide,
>> noting that it's a subrelease, *not* the next release, and so should
only have
>> bug and security fixes?
>
> I am not sure what the newer Qt provides, but I know that many KDE
> technologies rely on the latest-greatest Qt at the time of the KDE
> release. Your knowledge and participation in the thread would be most
> valuable, especially in this early stage:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.krita/5503

a) You do understand what I'm saying about subreleases vs. release? That
there shouldn't be anything that new (as opposed to, say, python 10-12
years ago, where each subrelease broke everything)? I would strongly urge
you to pass that question to the krista list.
b) I'd love to do some programming again, but a day job and a life outside
work (see (c)), I don't have time, and
c) I most certainly will *NOT* be on the list next week, as I'm getting
remarried Sat....

      mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux