Re: yum yum or not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, April 27, 2012 04:15, Shaun wrote:
> Well this is it. I've used both 'remove' and 'history undo' and had
> better success (system not having something important removed) with
> the latter.

I have only this suspicion.  It may be that yum history undo only rolls back the
changes actually made by the previous yum update/install since it 'knows' that the
system environment has not changed in the interim.  Whereas yum history remove,
since it has to cherry-pick packages from a possibly changed environment, instead
removes rpm dependencies based on the package specs of the items directly added by
the original yum command, whether these were installed in that transaction or not.

But, this is only a guess.

-- 
***          E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel          ***
James B. Byrne                mailto:ByrneJB@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Harte & Lyne Limited          http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive              vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario             fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux