On 04/24/2012 05:00 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > Any idea about samba3x packages? Are they vulnerable? > > ----- Original Message ----- > | > | CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0465 Critical > | > | Upstream details at : > | http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0465.html > | > | The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently > | syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) > | > | i386: > | 50fc234754d886f8147c22ed2b034d1f7be84dd78c10a8280699265a9c542cfa > | libsmbclient-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm > | 62c20ba55a5213be09a2250454274f1fbf6aa854e84d78aaa1f75aec5d2a1920 > | libsmbclient-devel-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm > | 294d346782344d32018a02ac25c9def811cbaced00ce19c0ca7c193d4f68d0c0 > | samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm > | b792d801b4d57882b7c3f398d44b378446d6be48a07b12b265f07dc25564db13 > | samba-client-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm > | 77a3666353bbc27ff71b1d4e34882459c5b440f783f21bb3c0adc3898ef501fb > | samba-common-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm > | 1bea83056056c3da0dc568f13655c61c6b14f56957e7180aaaa4d6d8f26f7c82 > | samba-swat-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm > | > | x86_64: > | 50fc234754d886f8147c22ed2b034d1f7be84dd78c10a8280699265a9c542cfa > | libsmbclient-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm > | 61b5237a09f59a445730e994517ad565fb24da1e9bf07b5e6b7b8c80ac6ca588 > | libsmbclient-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm > | 62c20ba55a5213be09a2250454274f1fbf6aa854e84d78aaa1f75aec5d2a1920 > | libsmbclient-devel-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm > | 5c973b1c9c0a986989805afe6f600a48a76d9d6175e92896065591795516a157 > | libsmbclient-devel-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm > | 55ee35ca8dc332e0bea6299ce2eed90d7b9460ae312a8abf42822cd0a737c555 > | samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm > | 70200f37cfe741d94e9bb9060f9f2128d08a90ac6b6674f97a9adb474ea3f41b > | samba-client-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm > | 77a3666353bbc27ff71b1d4e34882459c5b440f783f21bb3c0adc3898ef501fb > | samba-common-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm > | 16e9165d7d3f3099d45f6389a58f7ebc87642856414506728e5d8f0466e343a3 > | samba-common-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm > | e4f6f354d8a38ffb4f17af0be3736be3a9e055ba3e6ddff5f21a547fb8924d4f > | samba-swat-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm > | > | Source: > | 4e4b6d761aed021020fe8ac82340ba78f835fc4610516ee8564da347ac735e22 > | samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.src.rpm Yes, they are vulnerable ... and they were also updated: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2012-April/018561.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
