On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:14:19PM -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Scott Robbins wrote on 04/22/2012 05:53 PM:
> > Do you really need it? I much prefer vpnc.
> >
> > http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu/vpnc.html
> >
> > The Cisco client has always (in my less than humble opinion), been
> > pretty bad. I remember one wouldn't work on any smp, another wouldn't
> > work on 64 bit, etc.
> >
> >
>
> The EPEL packages work for me to connect to a Cisco VPN:
>
> NetworkManager-vpnc.x86_64 1:0.8.0-1.git20100411.el6 epel
> vpnc.x86_64 0.5.3-4.el6 epel
Yeah, vpnc works perfectly and almost always has for me. The one I mean is the one provided by Cisco. Sorry, I
probably wasn't clear. To be fair though, I haven't tried a Cisco client (that is, from Cisco), in a couple of
years, at least, vpnc does a perfect job for me.
--
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
