Re: rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



>I just assumed there was something newer out there. 2007 was the last
>release notes for the version installed on centos. There is a newer
>version out there, but that would be off of the base repo and not sure
>if I want to go that route in the how-to.

Dates aren't always a good judge of package quality. In the case of
of this one, there really hasn't been a need to update it, as it just
works. I assume some scripts have undergone changes though...

>I will take a look and try to see if it will be easy to change the
>postfix and dovecot. More than likely I will just tell them what it is
>and 'good luck' at figuring it out..lol

Only ignore what you encounter and deduce to be not important.
Thats the premise on which this works, known bad _or_ unknown
items are presented to you for you decide what to do.

>So, thanks for the input. I will stick with logwatch and give it a go.

Its really not that complicated, logwatch is pretty good at what it
does. Post back with more questions if they arise...

jlc
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux