On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:42:39PM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:26:32AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > http://blog.toracat.org/2010/03/want-a-custom-kernel-on-centos-noooooo-really/ > > Ah, CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y rings a bell! Let's try that :-) Bingo! % uname -sr Linux 3.2.9 (hidd failed to start, but I don't use bluetooth; I should just remove it!) This kernel also has trouble with the external USB disk. But.... % ifconfig wlan0 wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C4:3D:C7:BC:EA:89 inet addr:192.168.1.32 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 Woo! Thanks... -- rgds Stephen _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:54:38 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20120404174239.GB25724@mercury.spuddy.org>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
- References:
- 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela
- Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Akemi Yagi
- Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Stephen Harris
- 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- Prev by Date: virtio or IDE on SBS 2011 (or any domain controller)
- Next by Date: Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- Previous by thread: Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- Next by thread: Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- Index(es):
 |