On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:06:04AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > kmod-compat-wireless. Details are here: > > http://elrepoproject.blogspot.com/2012/03/one-size-fits-all-compat-wireless-fits.html > > So, give it a try. :) Yeah, I'd found that in my googling, but that says el6; I'm on el5 for historical reasons (hysterical raisins?) -- rgds Stephen _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:11:24 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CABA31DrKrFSyCLdg56hUdgmDCFzSiTPA-3w3Na=JOJbY_eezBg@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Akemi Yagi
- Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- References:
- 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Stephen Harris
- Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- From: Akemi Yagi
- 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- Prev by Date: Re: Centos 5.6 Kernel Panics
- Next by Date: Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- Previous by thread: Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- Next by thread: Re: 3.2 kernel with C5? Or ndiswrapper?
- Index(es):
 |