Warren Young wrote: > On 3/28/2012 11:02 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Warren Young wrote: >>> Still, I'd have to agree with m.roth: parted(8) has a...um...classical >>> UI. It's not far advanced beyond the ex(1) school of UI design. >> >> I disagree. I don't think it's advanced beyond that school.... > > Now, be fair. ex(1) responded to all errors with: > > ? > > Ya gotta give it to parted(8), it ain't that bad. But... but... parted responds to all partitioning with a statement that the partition's not aligned. And that's, well, memory's much cheaper these days, they can afford 80 chars instead of one. mark _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos