On 03/23/12 10:05 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > Would I see much difference in performance or CPU load between SAS > and SATA disks of the same geometry and RPM speed? Such as Seagate > Constellation drives, which are available in SAS or SATA. SAS disks tend to do better under high concurrency, and support dual porting. whether or not this matters with a simple mirror, I dunno. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: LSI 2008 SAS driver?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: LSI 2008 SAS driver?
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:32:04 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <jkiag4$78e$1@softins.clara.co.uk>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0
- References:
- Re: LSI 2008 SAS driver?
- From: Tony Mountifield
- Re: LSI 2008 SAS driver?
- Prev by Date: Re: Centos long end of life support, but im interested in packages themselves.
- Next by Date: Re: wiki - vnc -gerald and walsh, update?
- Previous by thread: Re: LSI 2008 SAS driver?
- Next by thread: CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 85, Issue 11
- Index(es):
 |