On 03/12/2012 05:11 AM, Wessel van der Aart wrote:
> i figured that if you use filesystems and protocols most native to the
> mac os you´ll get the best results in stability on the client side,
> that´s why i thought of HFS. but ext4 seems to do the job well.
> i´ll definitely checkout samba too. do you also serve homedirs to them?
> had any issues?
>
> Thanks,
> Wessel
>
> On 03/08/2012 06:07 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> Sorry it didn't work out for you. Linus, for one, has a pretty poor
> opinion of HFS in general.....and I'm not thrilled with it myself, due
> to some issues I had with Tiger on a PowerMac G4 and heavily corrupted
> filesystems, journaled or not. And I have some of the 'rescue' tools
> like DiskWarrior, and I've still lost some data. Hopefully your
> experience with ext4 will work out better. Mac OS X does very well with
> SMB/CIFS shares, too, if AppleTalk doesn't work out for you. (I run Mac
> OS X here in a few areas, and even Tiger works well with a Samba server,
> but I haven't tried any ACL's with it).
> _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
While I have no personal experience with it, I did notice that Apple
supports NFS with kerberos authentication which is documented on their
support site. It might be worth looking into.
Nataraj
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
