Re: LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:

> I have been having OpenOffice 3.2 for EL 5.x in my repo since it's 
> release, by unpacking it in my repo folder, but I think desktop 
> integration needed some work.
> 
> It is much easier to install on several systems from repository. And I 
> created virtual packages to install localized environment that pulls all 
> packages I wanted. And update is much simpler from repository, that is 
> why I am trying to force people to use it that way so we can move it to 
> regular repository.

So Ljubomir, you have unpacked the official rpms and made a repo out of 
them? That might work, with a meta-package that would pull in the core 
stuff.. Still not very elegant.
I really wish LO people would make a proper repo …
I'll mention this in my letter to Santa this year.

In the meanwhile we're probably going to have LO 3.4.5 in 6.3, so it's nice. 
Apparently 3.5.0 was not quite ready for (enteprise) prime time.


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux