hey! Lamar Owen wrote: > teams might work together. Any substance there (being that there are things > Scientific Linux has that I like and use, but they seem to be pretty much What are these 'things' that are not provided via the CentOS Distribution base ? - K -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ GnuPG Public Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
CentOS and SL, togther?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: CentOS and SL, togther?
- From: Mail-Lists at karan.org (Karanbir Singh)
- Date: Sat May 28 20:31:01 2005
- In-reply-to: <200505281224.40497.lowen@xxxxxxxx>
- References: <31877118.1117066730635.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117259687.22373.131.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1117281253.12498.58.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200505281224.40497.lowen@xxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- CentOS and SL, together?
- From: Lamar Owen
- CentOS and SL, together?
- References:
- Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan
- From: Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan
- From: Johnny Hughes
- CentOS and SL, togther?
- From: Lamar Owen
- Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan
- Prev by Date: Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan
- Next by Date: Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora
- Previous by thread: CentOS and SL, togther?
- Next by thread: CentOS and SL, together?
- Index(es):
 |