Re: Pam problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Les Mikesell wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Steve Campbell <campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Seems I've found that dovecot is handling the auth for smtp, and it
>> doesn't like sendmail very much since their documentation avoids
>> sendmail like the plague.

The Dovecot developer is a smart dude. :-)

> None of that makes any sense.  Dovecot should have nothing to do with
> smtp, so of course it doesn't have anything about sendmail in its
> documentation other than adding its local delivery agent which should
> be their only interaction and you probably don't even need to use
> that.

Actually it might. Dovecot can do the sasl auth part. I have not touched
sendmail in at least 10 years, so I do not know anything about the current
default sendmail config but I know dovecot sasl auth is easier to config
for postfix (5 lines in the postfix main.cf IIRC).

I suppose it is possible that RH switched sendmail to user dovecot sasl
in their default config.

HTH,

Regards,

-- 
Tom			me@xxxxxxxxxx		Spamtrap address	 		me123@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux