Re: firefox and IronPort

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Tris Hoar wrote:
> On 21/02/2012 15:58, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> A couple of weeks ago, I got an autogenerated email from the mail folks
>> here, telling me they'd quarantined what they thought was spam. The last
>> time I got one of these was a month or month and a half ago, and I had
>> no problem.
>>
>> This time, however, I get a 500 error. When I pulled up firefox's error
>> console, and clicked on the link, I got <servername elided>: server
>> does not support RFC 5746, see CVE-2009-3555
>>
>> I'm told they're running Cisco's IronPort. It appears the patch came out
<snip>
>> The support folks report they can get there, from Windows boxes.
<snip>
>> a) Is anyone else seeing this?
>> b) Any thoughts on whether it's an IronPort issue, or whether it might
>> be a bug (new or reintroduced) browser problem?
>
>  From my experiences with IronPort (admittedly from 3 years ago) I'd say
> blame that. The software is horribly buggy at best.

Wonderful. I still have to deal with it; I mean, the thought that I might
influence them to dump it... lol.

         mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux