Tris Hoar wrote: > On 21/02/2012 15:58, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> A couple of weeks ago, I got an autogenerated email from the mail folks >> here, telling me they'd quarantined what they thought was spam. The last >> time I got one of these was a month or month and a half ago, and I had >> no problem. >> >> This time, however, I get a 500 error. When I pulled up firefox's error >> console, and clicked on the link, I got <servername elided>: server >> does not support RFC 5746, see CVE-2009-3555 >> >> I'm told they're running Cisco's IronPort. It appears the patch came out <snip> >> The support folks report they can get there, from Windows boxes. <snip> >> a) Is anyone else seeing this? >> b) Any thoughts on whether it's an IronPort issue, or whether it might >> be a bug (new or reintroduced) browser problem? > > From my experiences with IronPort (admittedly from 3 years ago) I'd say > blame that. The software is horribly buggy at best. Wonderful. I still have to deal with it; I mean, the thought that I might influence them to dump it... lol. mark _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos