/ ================================= Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote />/ Yea, I gave up on bonding, ended up just using eth1. But every tutorial />/ I found had added eth0 and eth1 as interfaces to br0, thus sharing the />/ bridge so to speak. />/ All the tutorials were for debian though, all the centos ones ended up />/ pointing each eth to a different cridge (br0 and br1) / What are you actually trying to accomplish? You still seem to mix bonding and bridging willy nilly as if they are somehow related. They are not. Regards, Dennis ================================== Nothing at all to do with bonding. Not at all. eth1 to br0 , eth0 to br0....that's all. If that is possible, I see no reason for a bond at all. I just want to make sure if an NIC fails, the other one is still working while I am asleep and not a care in the world. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos