Boris Epstein writes:
>>
>>
>> Hello Boris,
>>
>> I'm in a similar search for a scalable and resilient solution. So far I
>> like
>> glusterfs, relatively easy to setup, no meta-server required, decent
>> performance, but I haven't tested it thoroughly. Been playing with their
>> latest beta release in a raid0+1 setup; haven't managed to lose any data
>> yet.
>>
>> I'll also be interested in opinions from other people.
>>
>> --
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
>
> Nux,
>
> Thanks for your response. I have looked into glusterfs and I like it too. I
> just haven't found the hardware to try it on.
I "tested" it on 4 VMs.. The performance was crap as expected, but wanted to
see how it behaves when I suddenly remove a node from the setup and so on.
(it went well, the setup froze for a second but after that kept working at
normal parameters)
>
> What is RAID0+1? The flat RAID with one parity disk?
No, I should've rephrased this, I meant the likes of raid10, of course, in
Glusterfs "speak". Basically I had 2 pairs of replicated nodes and files
stripped across all this.
I even ran a VM on top of this VM based glusterfs setup.. not the speediest
VM, but was usable. :-)
--
Nux!
www.nux.ro
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
