On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:04:31PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 03.02.2012 20:01, schrieb Stephen Harris: > > In this, Les is correct. The RFCs merely say the HELO needs to _a_ valid > > identifier for the host. Indeed this discussion was on this list back in > > July ("SPAM on the List") where I pointed out that RFC 5321 says > > i know the RFCs > > does not change that it is a dmaned good idea this days > to make matching A/PTR/HELO and it is EASY to do this A & PTR, yes. HELO, no. It's not even possible to do HELO matching PTR when NAT gets in the way. -- rgds Stephen _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos