On 01/27/2012 12:14 AM, Raymond Lillard wrote:
> There are two reasons T1 is more expensive. T1 requires
> 2 copper pairs in the cable. Those 2 pairs not available
> for voice traffic. The other reason is the uptime
> requirements.
the DS<X> or the old T<X> standard does not still deliver better
performance, reliability or maintainability/manageability than a network
cable plugged into the rack switch in a hosting facility. Also, with
these sort of telco links in ( not consumer grade adsl etc ) one needs
fairly expensive and hard to manage LTE kit. Then there is the p-o-f issues.
In this day and age, building out a facility inhouse only makes sense if
you have hundreds or more servers or need a facility that has no
internet links ( very very few of those these days ) or you are a
hosting company looking to build 30,000 odd sqft space to then lease out
and are going to plumb in multi fibre inbound.
Think about it - do you even want Inergen Canisters floating around a
residential facility ? Halon 1301 ? Or are you going to put in a
sprinker system and hope the insurance man does not test-run it and kill
every bit of electric equipment you have on site.
Just my 2bits.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
