Hi Aurf,
I am seeing a lot of solutions that are not all perfect and just insanely expensive. BackBlaze seems like a pretty decent solution, I have control of all hardware and software to do with as I please.
If you have ideas, please talk to me about them!
-Jason
--
Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 4:29 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I started a 501c3 (not-for-profit) organization back in February
> > 2011 to deal with information archival.
> > Database servers and storage servers would go on the private VLAN? I
> > am building a box to store all the data (mysql, video, crawl data,
> > static datasets) and I strongly think it might be a backBlaze POD
> > running CentOS.
>
>
>
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Not to be one of those guys who answers a question with a question,
> but... why backBlaze for archival?
>
> Are you building in some safe guards/redundancy not found in the
> current backBlaze implenetation?
>
> Just curious, not a challenge or anything.
>
> - aurf
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx (mailto:CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx)
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
