Dotan Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 16:23, Phil Schaffner > <Philip.R.Schaffner@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'd have a look at why an apparently Internet-facing server is 5 point >> releases, plus a lot of subsequent errata, behind the current 5.7 >> release level; and what resultant vulnerabilities might have been exploited. >> > > Thanks. There are a lot of very specific software on that server that > precludes it from being updated. I believe that 5.2 still is seeing > security updates, no? No. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos