> Correction to the above: the XFS partition is 26TB, not 16 TB (not that it > should matter in the context of this particular situation). Yes, it does matter: Read this: * 32-bit kernel+XFS+16.xTB filesystem = potential disaster* http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-April/109142.html _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: weird XFS problem
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: weird XFS problem
- From: Miguel Medalha <miguelmedalha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:27:21 +0000
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CADeF1XEw-whgRSTiz6m+SjAhdvrPfuzuDtYJ+ckBe=qyc9Q15w@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: weird XFS problem
- From: Boris Epstein
- Re: weird XFS problem
- References:
- weird XFS problem
- From: Boris Epstein
- Re: weird XFS problem
- From: Boris Epstein
- weird XFS problem
- Prev by Date: Re: weird XFS problem
- Next by Date: Re: weird XFS problem
- Previous by thread: Re: weird XFS problem
- Next by thread: Re: weird XFS problem
- Index(es):
 |