Re: Demonizing generic Linux issues as Fedora Core-only issues -- WAS: Hi, Bryan

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> We would not build and distribute either of these things if they were
> not released via the GPL.  The RPMS/SRPMS that we are distributing are
> indeed GPL.  We firmly agree with RedHat on this issue (that only GPL
> things should be distributed).

The problem is that many distros are statically building MySQL 4 with some
non-GPL components.  Some of the terms/definitions on static v. dynamic
building changed from MySQL 3 to MySQL 4.

I'll look into some of the latest Fedora Development and see if they are
approaching such now.  But one thing Red Hat seems to be doing is avoiding
a lot of the MySQL 4 developments because of MySQL AB's changes.

> CentOS will also not include in our repos anything that is not allowed
> to be re-distributed due to patents or US DMCA.

And I've noted that.

I said that's why I don't use "pure" Fedora (Core, Extras) or Debian-bases
(both RHEL and CentOS fall into that as well), and avoid both Livna.ORG
and DAG in a commercial environment.



--
Bryan J. Smith   mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux