Re: CentOS and LessFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 01/17/2012 04:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/17/12 4:41 PM, Nataraj wrote:
>> On 01/17/2012 03:36 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>>>  I wouldn't trust any of the software block-dedup systems with my only
>>>>  copy of something important - plus they need a lot of RAM which your
>>>>  old systems probably don't have either.
>>>>
>> I am interested in backuppc, however from what I read online it appears
>> that zfs is a very featureful robust  high performance filesystem that
>> is heavily used in production environments.
> ZFS is very memory intensive on larger file systems.  I believe they 
> recommend on the order of 1GB ram per terabyte of storage for decent 
> performance.
I think that is not so unreasonable for the features you are getting.  I
wonder if it would be possible to put the file system data structures on
an SSD?  I also have read that it is a good idea to use ECC memory on
such a fileserver, but that's really true of any computer.  Undetected
memory errors will cause data loss.
> Personally, I would only run ZFS for any sort of production application 
> on a Solaris 10/11 system where its natively supported, and then only 
> with a support contract from Oracle.
I am inclined to agree.  If I was setting it up for a serious production
environment, I would bite the bullet and run Solaris as well.
> When its good, its very good, when its bad, its reformat and restore 
> from backup time...
>
We'll maybe I'll live with backuppc for now.

Nataraj

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux