John R Pierce wrote: > On 01/14/12 1:56 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote: >> We are thinking about replacing these storage hosts with one solution, >> maybe a storage array with appropriate disk space and I/O capacity. >> What are pros and cons of that solution? Do storage arrays have >> appropriate I/O capacity (X*software RAID)? Does it scale good? Does >> storage capacity also scale good in those solutions? > > those questions are all extremely vague. 'storage arrays' vs 'storage > hosts' could mean almost anything. file a bug report on google-translate ;-) _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Storage - posibilities?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Storage - posibilities?
- From: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:19:11 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4F1155EB.4050302@hogranch.com>
- Mailscanner-null-check: 1327141067.4226@NRn9b2n716EUk00tml1Bbg
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1
- References:
- Storage - posibilities?
- From: Rafał Radecki
- Re: Storage - posibilities?
- From: John R Pierce
- Storage - posibilities?
- Prev by Date: Re: Storage - posibilities?
- Next by Date: iptable rule for bypassing netfilter queue for a matching address.
- Previous by thread: Re: Storage - posibilities?
- Next by thread: Re: Storage - posibilities?
- Index(es):
 |