Blah, blah, blah,
Being blocked again, still appears to be based on new content vs. included
content.
Which makes it very annoying when I want to include context for my response.
blah, blah, blah, new content.................
Hi, wwp,
wwp wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:31:43 +0100 Ljubomir Ljubojevic <office@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>> On 01/11/2012 08:45 AM, wwp wrote:
>> > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:57:14 -0800 (PST) John Doe<jdmls@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >> From: wwp<subscript@xxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >>> I wonder if some mount options aren't wrong with USB pendrives, see:
>> >>> /dev/sdd1 on /media/monolith type vfat
>> >>> (rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=udisks,shortname=mixed,dmask=0077,utf8=1,flush)
my suspicion is about the flush option, which I find atypical here.
<snip>
> ehci_hcd does manage my devices (it's not a loadable module, apparently
compiled in kernel instead), see for instance:
>
> kernel: usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 28
<snip>
This may be a dumb question, but have you done an lsusb? I'd be curious -
I know that on my brand new, as of a few months ago, Dell I have two kinds
of USB ports, 1.1 and 2.0. We also have some 1.1 webcams... and some 1.0.
See if your pen drive's in a slower port.
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
