Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'

[Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 10:47:44 AM m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I'll have to disagree, Lamar. There *are* large distros: RH & its
>> derivatives, SuSE, and Debian & its derivatives (i.e., Ubuntu), and though
>> there are kit distros (fedora?), they're more like the Big Three
>> automakers of the US, and I can't think of frequent crash&burn reports.
>
> In terms of commercial distributions, I see more of an analogy to REO, Hupmobile, Duesenburg, and Studebaker than the current large automakers.
>

I was thinking more of Ford getting people to forget about the Pinto -
which I think they have done fairly successfully although it may just
have to do with aging memory.  Let's see, that was around 1980.
Maybe I'll try Fedora again in 30 years.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos