Re: bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?

[Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Giles Coochey <giles@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> But you'd be wrong on all counts.  I'd argue the opposite - that you
>> should only be allowed to use languages that work across CPU types and
>> OS's so as to never be locked into a monopolistic single vendor.
>>
>
> So if I were to develop a CPU type and/or OS that didn't support Java then
> you would lock yourself out of the very language you appear to advocate?
>

Being locked out of some oddball thing is not at all the same
situation as being locked into what only a single vendor provides. But
try something like 'jenkins'  (http://jenkins-ci.org/) with an
assortment of cross-platform nodes to get the idea of how handy a
language with remoting across many platforms can be.  It's painless to
install try, even if you only use it on a single box.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos