yeah maybe..... but I think we've all discussed it all enough and maybe all thought about each others input I know I have.... I still disable it though 'cause its a real pain.... :-) P. Feizhou wrote: > Peter Farrow wrote: > >> As you have pointed out it restricts the security granularity of the >> system, which in turn will lead to other "work arounds" to achieve >> better granlarity and those work arounds will ultimately lead to >> sloppiness, making Johns point very valid indeed. >> > > Er...you are going to have to prove the sloppiness part. I, for one, > cannot believe an issue was made out of an non-issue. > > Each user having their own group ADDS to the security granularity. it > does not restrict it. > > What is really needed is the ability to limit access to a file on a > per user account basis (acls), not by locking down via a group > permission. John is creating an issue out of a non-issue. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos