>Agreed. I don't even label as idiots the idiots who post here, asking us >to tell them how to do the job they were hired for, without any indication >that they've read man pages, or googled for an answer. Last time I checked you *were* in this list therefore you are calling yourself an idiot. Jokes apart... calm down. You offend people with your tone and insults so I ask you to stop doing so. Regards _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- From: Marc Deop <damnshock@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:40:48 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <bfcac5d082cc48bef214d5efd8fe435c.squirrel@mail.5-cent.us>
- User-agent: KMail/4.8 rc1 (Linux/3.1.5-1-ARCH; KDE/4.7.95; x86_64; ; )
- References:
- what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- From: Bennett Haselton
- Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- From: Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- From: m . roth
- what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Prev by Date: sa-update error with perl
- Next by Date: Re: Checkinstall rpm for CentOS-6 x86_64?
- Previous by thread: Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Next by thread: Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Index(es):
 |