Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:33:41 PM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> If you use denyhosts or fail2ban, attacker needs 10,000 attack PC's that
>> never attacked any denyhosts or fail2ban server in recent time.
>
> That would be a very small botnet.
>
> And with gamers out there with CUDA-capable GPU's getting botted......
And, as a co-worker says, let's not forget renting time on Amazon's cloud....
<snip>
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- From: m.roth@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:10:23 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <201112301035.30851.lowen@pari.edu>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22
- References:
- Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic
- Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- From: Lamar Owen
- Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Prev by Date: Re: Need help in writing a shell/bash script
- Next by Date: Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Previous by thread: Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Next by thread: Re: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Index(es):
 |