Re: Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?

[Michael Lampe <lampe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:

> Biarch is actually only needed for libraries and support packages.
> Running native i386 application on x86_64 does not make much sense
> (third-party apps are another thing).

I also like the option to compile, run, test, debug, etc. my own 
programs as 32 bit. That's why starting with 5.x there's not only the 
libs, but also the devel-packages.

Biarch is at least to me a valuable feature. Anyway it's all there, just 
not in the ISOs it seems.

-Michael
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos