hi, On 12/28/2011 01:47 AM, Michael Lampe wrote: > I'm experimenting with 6.2 now. Things seem to be really great so far! nice! > Distribution closure is one of my favourite pets. So I tried to install > everything. thats tricky, ~ multiple things can provide overlapping functionality as well.. > So, Biarch is really dead? nope. its actually quite a major pain to manage.. you forgot to mention what you installed, how you did it and what you expected V/s achieved - KB _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
- From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 03:26:56 +0000
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4EFA7533.4060303@gcsc.uni-frankfurt.de>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111109 CentOS/3.1.16-2.el6.centos Thunderbird/3.1.16
- References:
- Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
- From: Michael Lampe
- Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
- Prev by Date: what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Next by Date: Re: Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
- Previous by thread: Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
- Index(es):
 |