Re: odd mdadm behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, aurfalien@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

>> I'm interested to know if you used mdadm to fail and remove the bad 
>> disk from the array when it first started acting up.
>
> No, I should have but left it alone.
>
> I know, my bad.

I was merely interested.

Recently I had a RAID-1 device get marked as bad, but I couldn't see 
any SMART errors. So I failed, removed, and then re-added the device. 
It worked for about a week, then it failed again, but time the SMART 
errors were obvious.

I'd ordered a new drive at the first failure, so I was ready when it 
failed the second time.

I guess the point is that I've seen "bad" drives go "good" again, at 
least for short periods of time.

-- 
Paul Heinlein <> heinlein@xxxxxxxxxx <> http://www.madboa.com/
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux