Re: Perl package problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 12/13/2011 07:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
>> To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
>> for priority settings?  It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-)   Thanks
> 
> It is not wise to have third-party repositories overwriting base 
> packages. This should only be used by hand per package basis.
> 
> I have created local repository where I copy packages I wish to replace 
> and only that "third-party" repository has same priority as official 
> repositories.
> 
> RPMForge (now RepoForge) has "non-violent", or safe repository that 
> *should not* contain packages that overwrite base packages, and 
> "violent" repository named "extras" that is meant to overwrite base 
> packages.
> 
Thanks.  I think that makes it clear - it seems that if I see this sort
of problem again I have to look at repositories that are not normally
enabled, and consider whether to temporarily enable them.  Is it safe to
leave rpmfusion-free-updates.repo and rpmfusion-nonree-updates.repo
without a specific priority setting?  The various testing repos are not
enabled.

Anne
-- 
Need KDE help?  Try
http://userbase.kde.org or
Http://forum.kde.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux