m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, December 7, 2011 17:06, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> firefox -no-remote &
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> Now, this is aggravating: I went to test it, and all our
>>> servers just got the current update last Friday, to either 5.7
>>> or 6.x, and on *both* 5.7 and 6, when I try to run firefox
>>> ssh -X yourservert running on my workstation), having
>>> issued the above command, it refuses, saying that it's already
>>> running, but not responding.... There, I just killed this
>>> session, and restarted it, and the session on my workstation's fine,
>>> but trying it on another server with -no-remote still fails.
>>>
>>> Anyone seen this since the last update?
>>
>> If you wish to run multiple instances of firefox on the
>> same host then you need a different user profile for each
>> I believe.
>
> I'm sorry, is my writing *that* unclear?
>
> I've always been able to ssh -X to a server, and then run firefox
> -no-remote, so that it runs ON THAT SERVER, NOT on my workstation. All of
> a sudden, I can't. Is that clearer? AFAIK, my manager hasn't put any new
> security in place (he'd have told me - mostly, he's adding logging). But
> the latest ff *seems* as though it's trying to read my home caches, not
> obeying what ff's own info says it will do.
Let me add one more thing: I have no trouble running other X, like xterm.
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
