Re: 6.1 .iso size?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> It's only when doing multiple things, or doing multithreaded things, that the
>>> Core2Duo pulls away.
>
>> OK, but who just runs a single process?
>
> For the purposes of usability, effectively anyone who spends the day in Firefox.  And there are a lot of people for whom that is the case.

Even there the tcp stack and filesystem operations should be mostly
running on a different core.

>> And 2GB RAM is kind of
>> minimal - I like lots of disk buffer.
>
> What you like is irrelevant to the usefulness of 2GB of RAM to other people.

It is very relevant to the performance they experience.

>> If you don't have things in
>> cache, your 'responsiveness in normal use' is going to be dominated by
>> disk waits.
>
> None of which negates the gist of the message, that a 2.0GHz Pentium M (and even a slower one) is still a usable machine. Nothing more; nothing less.

Nor my experience that a Core 2 Duo will save much human time and also
is able to run virtual machines that the pentium M can't. And  CentOS
5.x is still a usable OS, isn't it?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
      lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux