Re: 6.1 .iso size?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 12/05/11 11:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Phil Dobbin<phildobbin@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>> >>>  I guarantee that there'll be 32 bit systems for a minimum of 10 more
>>>> >>>  years. Esp. in the current depression, everyone will hang onto what they
>>>> >>>  have until the boxen die, or look to die. And then there's laptops....
>>> >>  then they should stick with older software.
>> >  Not really reflective of the spirit of open source software...
> You mean you don't think there are enough current choices?   Visit
> http://www.distrowatch.com...  Or do you think they_all_  have to
> support every possible device?

indeed, that was my point.  its silly to expect the latest release of 
ENTERPRISE LINUX, a distribution clearly targeted at servers, to have to 
support every funky old box end users can throw at it.

CentOS6 works freekin' awesome on a HP DL180G6 with dual Xeon X5660's, 
48GB ram, and a SAS raid10 of 20 x 15000 rpm 146GB drives.... Seeing 
over 6000 transactions/second sustained from postgresql's pgbench with 
sufficient threads and workload multipliers.   My circa 2004 Dell 
Latitude D600 "Dothan" (Pentium-M) laptop?   I wouldn't even bother to try.


-- 
john r pierce                            N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca                         mid-left coast

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux