Re: What happened to 6.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




Am 15.11.2011 23:43, schrieb John R. Dennison:
>>
>> I was wondering if it would be safe to just stay with the 'standard'
>> repo for centos and wait for 6.1 that way or do you suggest adding the
>> CR repo as a necessary event?
> 
> Depends on if you feel that security updates are important to your
> infrastructure.

but why in the world is an extra repo needed for security-updates?
it is like a bad joke installing a os and have to search how
to install a repo for ESSENTIAL updates while most people
think "i have a package manager and get updates"

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux